Who should report status against projects, and how often?

July 27th, 2009

Many project managers, department leaders, and process owners tend to take on the role of reporting status. They collect information from all the employees involved, merge, rewrite, update, put voice to that information, and publish it. It is time consuming work that has limited final value. By the time they are complete, it is often old news, and the intended audience has little interest. In fact, often, by the time the report is published, it is time to begin collecting information for the next report. The role of the manager becomes more about collecting and reporting status than managing the effort!

It can be argued that it is valuable work for the manager to collect this information. Employees will be challenged to take a look at what is going on in their area and the manager will have focused attention on that portion of their whole portfolio of work.
However, there are other ways to collect this information and ensure focus. We recommend that the manager hold their employees responsible to report status using a collaborative on-line location. If properly done, the employee written status will not have to be revised by the manager, can be visited by anyone that has the need and interest, and yet accomplishes the goal of focusing attention on the review effort.
In AccomplishTS, every project has the ability to have periodic status reports (weekly, monthly, quarterly) and more in-depth notes attached. Every employee involved in the project can provide entries. Each entry is dated and reports can easily be generated and saved for future reference – and they can printed in several formats such as rich text or spreadsheet. However, many of our clients tell us that keeping the information on-line and thus accessible on-demand by interested parties eliminates the need for printed reports.

Status report reminders can also automatically be sent, as well as an automatic capture of the status information for all projects in the system, giving an easy way to provide critical information to those that need it without a lot of tedious administrative tasks.
We recommend managers delegate to each employee in charge of important aspects of projects the job of providing weekly or monthly status updates. For instance, weekly status reporting could be required before the end of the day each Friday for critical projects, while lest critical projects would only require reporting monthly, such as before the end of the first workday of each month.

Weekly status updates are intended to be short and consist of bulleted statements concentrating on the following:
- what new was started,
- what was ended (completed or stopped),
- what redirection was decided,
- a prediction about future cost and schedule

Monthly status updates dig deeper into any mitigation or corrective action work planned to ensure the initiative is completed as planned, as well as a description of any changes to the original plan, including the reason for the changes and the impact expected. Monthly reports are intended to be a few paragraphs long – NOT pages.

Notes associated with a project status report can be of any length and the expectation is that they will be updated as needed. Additional documents can also be referenced or even attached to help build a complete record all in one location.

All levels of the organization are invited to review the status information. Managers, in particular, are expected to keep aware of status changes and hold conversations with their employees if there are questions. As much as possible, everyone’s time should be focused on understanding what current plans and actions are without extensive writing. Managers can thus manage, while employees doing the work can thus do the work!

Organic Strategic Planning

July 13th, 2009

Let’s face it. Most strategic planning is less than perfect. A team of executives spend a lot of time and energy attempting to understand the competition, the unique strengths of the company, opportunities that could be captured, and to develop a plan that would be outstanding if all worked as designed on paper. They then go out into the workforce and attempt to deploy the plan into the fabric of the organization, only to find that even the next level down in the hierarchy doesn’t quite understand. Like a bad copy of a copy, that poorly understood plan is inaccurately replicated to the next level, and on and on. By the time the work force that can really carry out the plan receives information, it is badly flawed and possibly dramatically outdated. The ship changes course, but for the wrong reasons and probably in the wrong direction. The think – deploy – act lag time and imperfect understanding frustrates the senior levels to the point of asking “how many times do we have to say this? Why is it so hard for everyone to understand…” or worse, “What are they doing? This isn’t what we intended…”

The bad news is that I just wrote and published a book that largely encourages this poor cycle of communications. The book, titled “Action with Traction,” explains how to figure out the mission, vision, values, goals, strategies, and initiatives in the organization. I included chapters on project management, process management, process improvement, and even change management. As the author, I am obviously biased but I think it is good stuff – at least compared to how strategic planning has been carried out since the turn of the 20th century.. Unfortunately, in today’s world, the lessons I included in the book are not enough. A management team that follows what I wrote will likely fall short in the deployment of the plan. There is more that must be done in order to get the organization all on the same page, rather than having much of the organization on an old page copied inaccurately from the original.

Organic strategic planning is probably the wrong term, but since I am giving a speech with that title in a few weeks, I am steadfastly going to hold onto that label as the answer to the problem of strategic plan deployment. In fact, I think this is a nice label to introduce the idea of modernizing strategic planning with web based tools in such a dramatic way that everyone (okay, perhaps not quite everyone but close) can not only understand the strategic plan, but help evolve it in real time.

Deployment of plans through staff meetings, company-wide planning meeting, abridged copies of the plan, and one-on-one meetings has been around a long time. There really weren’t options. The addition of the memo and later email was breakthrough, but the fundamental problem that deployment using these tools is primarily one-way exists.

Enter blogs, wikis, Tweeter, Facebook…and a host of other collaboration community tools. These tools have changed the nature of social networking and soon will change the nature of strategic planning. These tools, also called social media, are defined by Wikipedia as follows: “Social media is online content created by people using highly accessible and scalable publishing technologies. At its most basic sense, social media is a shift in how people discover, read and share news, information and content. It’s a fusion of sociology and technology, transforming monologues (one to many) into dialogues (many to many) and is the democratization of information, transforming people from content readers into publishers. Social media has become extremely popular because it allows people to connect in the online world to form relationships for personal, political and business use.”

Here is a quick assessment of some of those tools as well as the old tried and true tools, as they relate to strategic planning and especially to a continuous evolution of plans (a process) rather than an annual event (a project).

The meeting…anytime two or more people get together around a specific topic, they have a meeting. This can be effective if managed correctly, but it is an expensive use of everyone’s time. It is especially powerful in building consensus and building commodore between individuals. Effective facilitation can minimize unproductive time, but it is very expensive. A meeting is a many-to-many form of interactive communications that has the advantage of body language and the disadvantage of everyone having to dedicate their time for the length of the meeting. It is also serial in nature in that to be effective, only one person at a time can be driving the communication.

In strategic planning, meetings are often the format for marathon thinking as the strategic planning event unfolds. Each level of management is expected to have creative brilliance in a fairly short period of time as they meet to determine the future of their organization. This is rather unrealistic, but is aided with pre-work in good organizations.

The memo…the old written memo is quickly fading against the speed and agility of on-line alternatives. The function of the memo (communicating something) remains, but the vehicle has evolved from paper to computer or phone screen. The memo is a one-to-many form of communications, although using edit features, it is possible to allow several people to participate.

In strategic planning, the memo is how many of the plans are communicated to ‘the troops.’ It is a semi-formal way of placing the plan into action. Unfortunately, the memo is often skim read and then filed in some safe spot only to be accessed if there is a dire need.

Email…email is fast, it can be one-to-many in format or one-to-one, has all the benefits of the memo, and is hugely flexible. It has the dual benefit and liability of chain emails, allowing a large number of people to participate in an online conversation. Unfortunately, these conversations are typically unstructured and the sheer volume of email most people receive leads to lost, ignored, or skim read information.

Threaded dialogue (forums)…forums are strings of discussion between people over a period of time. A topic is established and a site opened for participation. Those with proper authorization can then post questions, comments or responses, allowing for a rich exploration of a topic. Forums are very common as a form of help and self-help around specific products or services, as well as medical and other topics many people can offer opinions to questions posted by interested participants. Forums are one-to-many as well as many-to-many in format, are topically based, self-documenting, and voluntary in participation. Participation can take place over a long period of time, as well, from any location having adequate internet access.

In strategic planning, the threaded dialogue (forum) can be used to explore competition, alternative approaches to a market, the development of a new concept, or just about any aspect of the plan. It can be a powerful way to involve many people without requiring them to sit through a meeting or engage in potentially confusing strings of email. It does require someone to be thoughtful about the subject to be discussed and for all participants to ‘tune into’ the conversation (unlike email, where the conversation comes to everyone the author believes should be involved). This extra discipline of tuning into the conversations can be troublesome if not managed correctly.

Document libraries…document libraries provide a place online for secure storage and access of documents. Anyone with proper authority can create a folder and file a document. They can also provide a new version of the document and, in most cases, both the new version and the old version will remain available.

In the old days, reports and plans were placed in binders and either stored in a central location to act as a department or corporate library or, more likely, kept on a shelf at someone’s desk. Later, these documents were more often online in someone’s computer or perhaps on a shared intranet drive. New document libraries expand that to allow access to the library through the internet and radically improve the control of these documents. Corporate information can be corporate (universal) rather than potentially being lost if the owner employee leaves the company.

In strategic planning, supporting documents and final plans can be intelligently linked and made available to everyone that needs access. They can be spreadsheets, word processing documents, images, or just about any digital file. However, the power of the wiki might overshadow much of the use of document libraries.

Wikis…Wikis, invented by one of our own from Portland, Oregon, are effectively documents that can be opened up for shared editing, extensive categorizing, and immediate availability from anywhere on the internet. Past versions of wikis are usually captured, allowing a complete history of how an idea or entire document evolves, and who made what changes. Wikipedia is one of the best examples of the power and reach of the wiki tool. Many help files and user documentation for software now is in wikis, and entire employee manuals, standard operating procedures, and even strategic plans are now living in the wiki world.

In strategic planning, the power of multiple people editing all or portions of an organizational plan under full version and access control is obvious. Continuous evolution of the plan can be managed with little wasted time from any contributor. Like Wikipedia, a review team can ensure quality and provide recommendations for validation and evolution of any topics. The discipline of appropriate and proactive participation is the primary hurdle that must be overcome.

Blog…Blogs, a word derived from ‘web log’ are date stamped documents. You are reading a blog that is tagged with a topic that hopefully you find interesting. Blogs from all over the internet with the same tag can be accessed for incredibly powerful research, usually turning up the absolute latest ideas on any given topic. There should be concern on accuracy of information, of course, since the source might not be qualified, but ideas are ideas. Further, the date orientation of blogs allows easy evaluation of how ideas and concepts, or events, have taken place over time. Sequencing of information is built in.

In strategic planning, blogs can be a tremendous source of third party research on just about any topic. Further, used internally, blogs can provide a method of tracking progress against tactical implementation of strategic plans.

Podcast… audio or video messages called podcasts are much like blogs in that they are typically focused on a specific topic and are time dated. They have the advantage of being multimedia and yet are not difficult to produce. They exist as digital files that can be accessed and viewed or listened to by authorized users, often through an Apple IPod or similar device if a computer is not convenient.

In strategic planning, podcasts can be an effective way for the message of the plan to be disseminated throughout the organization without error in message.

Instant messaging / text messaging…American Online created instant messaging to allow members to send short notes to each other. The idea caught on with other internet services and bloomed when the cell phone evolved it to text messaging. These one-to-one short communications have become a primary method of fast communications by the youth, allowing them to carry on many simultaneous conversations over short period of time. They have even created a short-cut language, driven initially by the use of awkward phone keyboards, but continued popularity because of the speed and brevity that results.

In strategic planning, text messaging can allow the capture and evolution of strategic ideas and tactical planning on the fly, all contained in short bursts. It can facilitate teams on the road as well as teams all located in the same place but busy. However, Twitter will likely be a stronger but very similar vehicle used in the corporate world.

Twitter…Twitter is the newcomer to the toolset. Twitter is similar to text messaging in that it consists of up to 140 characters of information from the author, often using a cell phone. Interested people can follow these messages, called Tweets, either being alerted every time a message is sent or through the Twitter website allowing the tracking of all tweets by the author. Twitter also has a powerful search engine that reviews all tweets for keywords. By looking at the most current tweets, nearly real time tracking of events unfolding or collective thought on a particular subject can be researched.

In strategic planning, Twitter can be an effective tool to replace brainstorming alternative strategies, for instance, as well as for completing strong third part research. For tactical implementation tracking, Twitter can also be used to provide rapid and frequent updates, all searchable by topic.

Social sites (e.g. Facebook)…websites dedicated to friends communicating with friends have emerged with Facebook the current winner. These sights allow the owner to post messages, pictures, and links effectively depicting their lives. Most of the information is kept private to ‘friends’ but some can be opened to the general public. Friends can also post information to the owner on the site, much of which can be seen by other friends.

In strategic planning, sites tuned specifically for development and evolution of plans for the company can bring the entire team together and provide an open format that will help keep the plan evolving, everyone participating, and even connect to tactical plans to help manage the actual implementation of the strategies. While only a few of these focused sites exist, more will likely evolve as organizations realize the power of bringing together all these tools under one secure hood. AccomplishTS (www.processpath.com) is one of the few sites fully developed to provide this power.

So, are most of these new tools fads that will eventually go away, allowing us to return to the basic memo and meetings? I doubt it. According to Internet World Statistics, there are approximately 1.6 billion internet users today, which is nearly 24 percent of the world’s population. Facebook was founded in February 2004 and today have over 200 million active users, about half of whom log on at least once a day. Two thirds of Facebook users are outside of college and 70 percent are outside the United States. Twitter was founded in March 2006 and Forrester Research estimates the number of Twitter users at nearly 5 million in March 2009.

Senior management in corporations have not yet embraced many of these tools, but they will have to eventually. Their new employees will wonder why the company is so backward and apply pressure for change – and go to the competition if change does not come quickly enough. Further, new tools using the power of the internet are very likely to appear in a browser near you soon. They will redefine how we communicate and plan, interact, and track the evolution of ideas.

So, get ready for a new day in strategic planning!

Project Forms

June 15th, 2009

Over the last couple of years I have had the opportunity to work with Portland Metro (an organization led by an elected board to manage the development of the Portland, Oregon  metropolitan area).  Through Portland State University, I have taught almost every member of management the subject of tools for project management.  This includes a standard set of forms that help guide every phase of projects.

I was delighted to find recently that the Metro staff has taken ownership over their internal use of the toolset by modifying many of the forms to fit their particular needs.  In fact, they have moved beyond using the tools just for project management and have extended into using some of the forms for process management.  (They refer to processes as programs).

The tools they have adopted include the following:

  • Project Complexity Assessment…is a checksheet and form that allows the project sponsor to evaluate how rigorous the project management approach should be.  Some projects are fast and easy, requiring very little approval or oversight.  Other projects are large, complex, and/or politically important enough to require the careful guideance of the elected officials.
  • Project Proposal…this form outlines everything a typical project should have specified before starting, including specification, cost, timing, and responsibilities.
  • Council Project Proposal…this is a special form of the Project Proposal that adds certain information important if the Metro Council of elected officials approval and guidance will be required.
  • Stakeholder analysis…in the very public arena of Metro, it is important that all stakeholders have the opportunity to participate in projects.  This tool not only identifies who the stakeholders are, but encourages the development of a communications plan to ensure participation at the right times and in well designed forums.
  • Responsibility matrix…outlines who does what on the project.  Metro decided to use the PARIS format to determine roles (Participant, Accountable, Review Required, Input Required, and Sign-off Required).  The form encourages not only project team member responsibiities to be identified, but also key stakeholders.  It relates responsibility to each task.  For project that involve elected officials or other high profile individuals, an alternative Responsibility matrix using RAPID rather than PARIS was developed.  The RAPID approach (Recommend, Agree, Perform, Input, Decide) provides more distinction between those who decide and those who agree.
  • Risk assessment… provides a way to list all major risks, assess them into red, yellow or green levels of concern, and establishes a methodology for ongoing monitoring and reporting.
  • Project status reports…focus on budget, schedule and approval of deliverables, using a red, yellow, green at a glance approach supported by more indepth data.  The report includes a listing of issues and concerns, as well as next action items for the project team, senior management, and the Metro Council.
  • Program status reports…are very similar to project status reports, except they focus on processes.  Any appropriate set of metrics replaces the budget, schedule and approval of deadlines used in the project status report.  This form uses the same red, yellow, green at a glance approach supported by more indepth data to track the performance metrics.  Besides listing issues and concerns and next actions included inthe project status report, it also includes and area for the analysis of risks and opportunities.
  • Scope change form…provides a way to request and receive approval for changes to a project or program.  It is supported by a detailed log providing a complete history of changes.
  • Project Evaluation guide…provides a review of the entire project from aspects including framing, work plan, personnel, analysis, communications, tools, and outcomes.

The Metro tool set is a great example of an organization proactively adapting generic tools to meet their individual needs.  Each of these forms is used by the project team and managed by the project manager and sponsor.

In AccomplishTS, forms like these are placed in the document library in each work area associated with each project or program.  All team members, project sponsor, and authorized stakeholders participate in continuously keeping the forms updated and current.  Tied to the built in metrics and structure of AccomplishTS, a powerful, fully customized solution evolves, leading to powerful results.

The lessons I have learned from Portland Metro have stimulated me to begin to expand the chapters on project management and process management in my book, Action with Traction.  It is clear to me that a second edition is not far off!

Creating a strong strategy is more than good words – it is about learning and involvement

June 1st, 2009

There is a strong need for executive management teams to periodically check out from day to day operations and check into a retreat focused on developing strategy.  This import effort is a chance for the leadership team to focus on the future direction of the organization and to identify or update metrics that are critical for the organization to score well on, as well as to identify specific goals and strategies to achieve those metric scores.

This is hard work.  It requires careful consideration of what the mission of the organization is, what the organization is capable of achieving in the near future, and extending that understanding as far out into the future as possible.  It includes analyzing what is resisting short and long term results and determining what effort is worthwhile to expend on each obstacle.  That information must then be translated into a set of metrics that will indicate progress and establishment of goals against those metrics that will stretch the organization as well as be reasonably achievable.

All this must be followed with an ‘unpacking’ of the this vision into a set of goals and associated strategies that will set the direction of the organization for some reasonable time.  Often this is aided by reviewing previous goals and strategies, competition, industry trends, and other information that  give the leaders ideas as well as clarify constraints.

The strategies that evolve are the result of tremendous learning.  However, at the end of the retreat, that learning was only experienced by those that attended.  An important step is to work with the rest of the organization, at all levels, through an involvement process to not only share the results of the retreat, but also to advance it and help everyone experience as much of the learning as possible.  By holding meetings with cross-sections of the employees throughout the organization to explore the metrics, the metric targets, the strategies and their associated goals, many good ideas, concerns, and new directions will emerge,  Even more important, employees will develop their own sense of direction for the organization and the mindset of ownership will evolve – and thus commitment to the directions that eventually emerge in the form of initiatives.  This is critical, since the work of those initiatives will be carried out by those same employees.

Ownership and commitment evolve if employees feel they have the opportunity to not only give input, but to also make a contribution to the final plan.  While the leadership team will have a great deal of their own blood, sweat and tears in the outcome from the retreat, there is huge value in making sure that they sincerely listen to what the employees say, not only to understand their words, but also to consider the view from the employee perspective and to make changes when appropriate.

After members of the executive team have engaged the employees in interactive sessions, holding a second retreat is a good idea.  In that retreat, the metrics, targets, goals and strategies should be updated, and a first attempt at creating initiatives started.  All of this should then be taken back to the employees and evolved yet again.

If it sounds like a lot of work, it is. This interactive approach, however, is the best way to help the organization learn and contribute to the direction of the organization.  It is the only way to ensure that the direction has been evolved with the best thinking of the whole organization and at the same time ensure that the majority of employees will be committed to support that direction.

Since this is a big effort, consider only focusing on a portion of the whole set of strategies at a time, cycling through continuously so the conversation between the executive team and the employees is nearly continuous and the plans of the organization are current yet fluid.